Archive

[vc_row css_animation="" row_type="row" use_row_as_full_screen_section="no" type="grid" angled_section="no" text_align="left" background_image_as_pattern="without_pattern" padding_bottom="155" el_class="file-inner-text"][vc_column el_class="custom-width-file"][vc_column_text]Plaintiff brought this suit on behalf of all customers of Verde Energy USA, Inc (“Verde”) in Connecticut alleging that Defendant’s variable  electricity rates in  Connecticut were not, as it claimed in its contracts, based on...

[vc_row row_type="row" use_row_as_full_screen_section="no" type="grid" angled_section="no" text_align="left" background_image_as_pattern="without_pattern" padding_bottom="155" css_animation="" el_class="file-inner-text"][vc_column el_class="custom-width-file"][vc_column_text]Plaintiff brought this suit on behalf of all customers of Direct Energy Services in Connecticut and Massachusetts, alleging that Direct Energy charged extraordinarily high variable rates for the supply of electricity that were not –...

[vc_row row_type="row" use_row_as_full_screen_section="no" type="grid" angled_section="no" text_align="left" background_image_as_pattern="without_pattern" padding_bottom="155" css_animation="" el_class="file-inner-text"][vc_column el_class="custom-width-file"][vc_column_text]Plaintiffs brought this class action on behalf of the University of Chicago Retirement Income Plan for Employees, the Nova Southeastern University 403(b) Plan and all similarly-situated defined contribution plans.  The Complaint alleges that TIAA violates...

[vc_row row_type="row" use_row_as_full_screen_section="no" type="grid" angled_section="no" text_align="left" background_image_as_pattern="without_pattern" padding_bottom="155" css_animation="" el_class="file-inner-text"][vc_column el_class="custom-width-file"][vc_column_text] Plaintiff brought this suit on behalf of all participants of the Mercy Health Partners Retirement Plan (the “Plan”).  Plaintiff alleges that the Plan was not operated in accordance with the Federal Employee Retirement Income Security...

[vc_row row_type="row" use_row_as_full_screen_section="no" type="grid" angled_section="no" text_align="left" background_image_as_pattern="without_pattern" padding_bottom="155" css_animation="" el_class="file-inner-text"][vc_column el_class="custom-width-file"][vc_column_text]    Plaintiff brought this class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of the Jupiter Center Retirement Plan and all similarly-situated employee pension benefit plans...

[vc_row css_animation="" row_type="row" use_row_as_full_screen_section="no" type="grid" angled_section="no" text_align="left" background_image_as_pattern="without_pattern" padding_bottom="155" el_class="file-inner-text"][vc_column el_class="custom-width-file"][vc_column_text]Plaintiffs brought this suit on behalf of themselves and other owners of multi-unit apartment properties in California, to stop DirecTV’s policy and practice of installing its equipment on their buildings without their permission.  The Complaint...

[vc_row css_animation="" row_type="row" use_row_as_full_screen_section="no" type="grid" angled_section="no" text_align="left" background_image_as_pattern="without_pattern" padding_bottom="155" el_class="file-inner-text"][vc_column el_class="custom-width-file"][vc_column_text]Plaintiffs brought this class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas on October 9, 2017, on behalf of themselves and all participants in the Phillips 66 Savings Plan (the...

[vc_row css_animation="" row_type="row" use_row_as_full_screen_section="no" type="grid" angled_section="no" text_align="left" background_image_as_pattern="without_pattern" padding_bottom="155" el_class="file-inner-text"][vc_column el_class="custom-width-file"][vc_column_text]Plaintiff brought this class action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma on September 28, 2020, on behalf of himself and all participants in the Seventy Seven Energy Inc. Retirement...

[vc_row row_type="row" use_row_as_full_screen_section="no" type="grid" angled_section="no" text_align="left" background_image_as_pattern="without_pattern" padding_bottom="155" css_animation="" el_class="file-inner-text"][vc_column el_class="custom-width-file"][vc_column_text]Plaintiffs brought suit against the manufacturers of Korean Ramen Noodle products and the U.S. subsidiaries on behalf of themselves and other consumers who purchased Korean Ramen Noodles in various states from 2000-2010.  Plaintiffs allege that...

On November 3, 2016, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut approved a class action settlement in this lawsuit alleging that St. Francis avoided federal requirements relating, among other things, to fully funding its employee pension plan, by improperly claiming a “church...